Whats the penalty for putting 100% navhaz outside your base to catch pods during the truce?

Oh goodie, a truce debate. It's been so long... (grabs popcorn)

putting 100% navhaz outside your base

NO COMBAT is permitted during the truce period. This includes, but is not limited to, offensive port destruction, nav haz traps, roach motels

NO INDIRECT COMBAT: Players using aggressive gridding scripts that invade another players home sector during a truce is a TRUCE VIOLATION. ...... IF YOUR SCRIPT IS UNABLE TO OBSERVE THE TRUCE, DO NOT USE IT OR RISK GETTING A PENALTY BAN FROM 1 TO 3 DAYS!

DEFINITION OF A FRONT OR HOME SECTOR: Any sector located in the entrance of a "dead-ended" tunnel or bubble where you have placed your planets can be defined as a truce protected home sector during the truce period.
You may defend that front sector with all available resources, with one exception, NO INTERDICTING . The Defendable Front Sector of your Home Tunnel or Bubble is determined by where your first line of planets are located, and not by the physical entrance of your tunnel or bubble.

So many rules. Don't play truce games. That simple.

Ok, ultimate truce rules are at:
http://ultimatetw.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=398

There is a rule:


But also a rule:


So, are you sure the haz is outside what this player thinks of as 'base?'

Base defined as:


Truce violations can be sticky.

I agree with Timberwolf. If you're not "smart" enough to survive in a truce game, then don't play!

The rules are easy, I was asking about the penalties for breaking them.

Comd Data

NO INDIRECT COMBAT: Players using aggressive gridding scripts that invade another players home sector during a truce is a TRUCE VIOLATION. ...... IF YOUR SCRIPT IS UNABLE TO OBSERVE THE TRUCE, DO NOT USE IT OR RISK GETTING A PENALTY BAN FROM 1 TO 3 DAYS!

Typically, I attempt to correct the problem while causing the minimum amount of interference with the game play and usually, the players involved reconcile their differences, make reparations and continue to play.

OPENING UP A TOPIC IN CLASSICTW only causes delay for resolution of the problem and does nothing but invite uneducated comments from people who aren't smart enough to survive in truce games.

The player should give me the game letter as well as detailed information so that I may investigate the truce violation asap. If I determine that the violation claim is substantiated, then I immediately reinstate the damaged player and take action against the violating players or Corp, whichever may be the case. The action I take will be determined by the nature of the violation. Typically, I attempt to correct the problem while causing the minimum amount of interference with the game play and usually, the players involved reconcile their differences, make reparations and continue to play.

Hope that clarifies the issue.

Sage

The very concept of "Truce Games" in Tradewars strikes me as - strange.

It is a war game. Why have an enforced Truce?

Then in the last decade or so, players get bent out of shape if people Megacorp (99.9% unprovable, unless the perps are idiots)?