| Author |
Message |
|
Singularity
Veteran Op
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 2:00 am Posts: 5558 Location: USA
|
 Re: m()m bot
Quote: I agree to an extent, if we are on a corp and I get up to go get a drink or throw some cothes in the drier I fail to see the prob with one of my corps to turn on saveme or citkilla if I was going to do it anyways when I got back. Doesn't matter if I started it before or after I sat back down 10min later, or whether he started it cause he is a bit impatient. I think it can be extended to other lengths of time. AFK for dinner, heck even AFK for work. Bots are not creative. I just played a game w/ a few ppl where this one new player was running a bot and hadn't checked the screen in at least a day. We obliterated the game, he was hiding on a planet and I didn't feel like detting perfectly good planets just to kill him. After the last 2 days of his corp getting plastered he finally came to keys long enough to grab a cloak and cloak out. A lot of good that bot did. Numerous times I've seen entire corps getting botted and the controlling player die on something. Their entire corp is then null. I saw it on a BYOC game once, the guy was pgridding and died when he over-estimated a macro's speed. He died, left the planet sitting there... his entire corp soon joined him. There are some real tactical downsides to botting your entire corp. I don't feel a need to make special rules about the situation... real game play will level the odds anyway. I just think it's crappy way to play and wish ppl wouldn't do it. Most of all I dislike the attitude that's sprung up of people just coming on, loading a bot and leaving... thinking that's all they need to do. "Hey, I turned on a bot, what else do you want?!" ... ugh.
_________________ May the unholy fires of corbomite ignite deep within the depths of your soul...
1. TWGS server @ twgs.navhaz.com 2. The NavHaz Junction - Tradewars 2002 Scripts, Resources and Downloads 3. Open IRC chat @ irc.freenode.net:6667 #twchan 4. Parrothead wrote: Jesus wouldn't Subspace Crawl.
*** SG memorial donations via paypal to: dpocky68@booinc.com
|
| Fri May 23, 2008 4:27 pm |
|
 |
|
Mind Dagger
Chief Warrant Officer
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 3:00 am Posts: 136 Location: USA
|
 Re: m()m bot
Singularity wrote: There are some real tactical downsides to botting your entire corp. I don't feel a need to make special rules about the situation... real game play will level the odds anyway. I just think it's crappy way to play and wish ppl wouldn't do it. Most of all I dislike the attitude that's sprung up of people just coming on, loading a bot and leaving... thinking that's all they need to do. "Hey, I turned on a bot, what else do you want?!" ... ugh. I agree completely that one player controlling an entire corp of bots is a definite disadvantage compared to an active team on the other side. I also agree that it's sucks when someone logs on and then you never hear from them again, unless of course they let you know that before they joined up. The bots can be used in stupid ways and they can be abused in a way that mimics duping, but I never had a real problem with that myself. Actually I think that a person who logs in, turns on a bot, then walks away for the duration of the game would have done the exact same thing without a bot. At least with the bot on, they can serve a purpose while they are busy/lazy/whatever the reason. The experience I have always had in a game is many times there is only one person at keys at a given time. Sometimes that was me, and sometimes it wasn't. Differing schedules sometimes dictate the style of play. If you know who you are corping with, you know whether they want you to use their turns or not most of the time. You get used to what time they are going to be coming to keys, and make sure to use their turns if necessary so they don't overflow. To me that is just another aspect of being a part of a team. I don't have the ability to play anymore, so I am not sure why I am even worrying about this topic but I thought it should be said. I believe that bots allow people who otherwise wouldn't have the time to commit play the game at a competitive level. There will be some who never move on beyond letting someone else control them, but those people are always going to be around. MD
|
| Fri May 23, 2008 5:37 pm |
|
 |
|
Parrothead
Commander
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 2:00 am Posts: 1722 Location: USA
|
 Re: m()m bot
1) My bot is a full blown helper...just like Swath 2) Solo vs Bot.....get corpies....Prom's non-stop whining about this issue is enuff. 2a) I use my Bot when I play Solo . 3) Few players will stick around Just to be someones Dupe. 4) Bot's allow peeps with different schedules to play. 5) Bot's allow you to just walk away and eat dinner etc without problems.
Trying to get peeps together to SDT most days is inconvient...without Bots my corp would rarely be able to cash......its why I wrote it in the first place.
Try Writing one then get back to me on complaints.
my 2 c
_________________ Coconut Telegraph (ICQ)#586137616 Team Speak3@ 220.244.125.70:9987 Founding Member -=[Team Kraaken]=- Winner of Gridwars 2010 - Ka Pla
 Jesus wounldn't Subspace Crawl
|
| Fri May 23, 2008 6:47 pm |
|
 |
|
Big D
Veteran Op
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 4:04 pm Posts: 5025
|
 Re: m()m bot
This conversation is pretty much a waste of time. Scripts & bots will be used, dupes and cheats will play, and there's not much any of us can do about it except choose not to play. As a sysop, there's not much I can do about it on my server, let alone as a player on someone else's server. The only one that can change game play is the one that has the code, and at this time he would be known as J.P. The only suggestion that I have for sysops that really want to eliminate scripts is to set the max commands per cycle to 2. Of course this will seem like drastic lag to the players that do try to run scripts and they'll probably not return to your server.
|
| Fri May 23, 2008 7:04 pm |
|
 |
|
Cerne
Gameop
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 2:00 am Posts: 991
|
 Re: m()m bot
Big D wrote: This conversation is pretty much a waste of time. Especially since it started from of a lack of reading comprehension in another thread. Cerne
_________________ "All warfare is based on deception..." - Art of War "Time will tell all tales" - SG Any advanced tactic in TW is indistinguishable from cheating.
|
| Fri May 23, 2008 8:14 pm |
|
 |
|
Promethius
Ambassador
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 3:00 am Posts: 3141 Location: Kansas
|
 Re: m()m bot
Parrothead wrote: 1) My bot is a full blown helper...just like Swath 2) Solo vs Bot.....get corpies....Prom's non-stop whining about this issue is enuff. 2a) I use my Bot when I play Solo . 3) Few players will stick around Just to be someones Dupe. 4) Bot's allow peeps with different schedules to play. 5) Bot's allow you to just walk away and eat dinner etc without problems.
Trying to get peeps together to SDT most days is inconvient...without Bots my corp would rarely be able to cash......its why I wrote it in the first place.
Try Writing one then get back to me on complaints.
my 2 c I'm not sure where you come up with whining when this is a discussion, some prefer solo play and some prefer corp play - I prefer solo and not relying on someone to bail me out. Your attitude toward anyone that disagrees with your point of view seems to elicit a negative response - so, PH, quit whining about the discussion. The use of bots is still someone playing someone elses turns and actions. A bot used by a solo is, as Zark stated, just another script - basically a menu type seleciton of the script to use. Can't get a corpie to play his/her turns, well that is just a crying shame. Can't run team SDT because of conflicting schedules, get different corpies. Don't cry because a corpie doesn't do what they are supposed to (or what you want them to) do. I see botted players as nothing but glorified dupes. ICQ 4-5 people, have them log in turn on their bot and now you have a corp that does exactly what you want done.
_________________
/ Promethius / Enigma / Wolfen /
"A man who has no skills can be taught, a man who has no honor has nothing."
|
| Fri May 23, 2008 8:34 pm |
|
 |
|
Parrothead
Commander
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 2:00 am Posts: 1722 Location: USA
|
 Re: m()m bot
No I like the corpies I got...We interact on voice..talk about different thing etc etc...more to corpies than a time and place to cash.
If you like solo play Prom then Play solo games...simple.
Scripts that use Corpies are interesting . We have some that use 3 or more in concert.
Low turns = Mbbs = Megarob
This means cashing gets done pretty much anytime some is at keys and the ports are up. All you need is a couple corpies with Bots running. Cashing is not my favorite thing in the game and anything that makes it easier I'm all for.
Bots are here to stay as is Swath Zoc and any number of helpers.
Ps...the whining comment came from the same thing being said with the solo/corpie thing being beaten to death on multiple threads....The horse is Dead...Dead ...Dead.....we get it you and Cerne cant find a regular corpie
_________________ Coconut Telegraph (ICQ)#586137616 Team Speak3@ 220.244.125.70:9987 Founding Member -=[Team Kraaken]=- Winner of Gridwars 2010 - Ka Pla
 Jesus wounldn't Subspace Crawl
|
| Fri May 23, 2008 9:23 pm |
|
 |
|
Promethius
Ambassador
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 3:00 am Posts: 3141 Location: Kansas
|
 Re: m()m bot
Parrothead wrote: No I like the corpies I got...We interact on voice..talk about different thing etc etc...more to corpies than a time and place to cash.
If you like solo play Prom then Play solo games...simple.
Scripts that use Corpies are interesting . We have some that use 3 or more in concert.
Low turns = Mbbs = Megarob
This means cashing gets done pretty much anytime some is at keys and the ports are up. All you need is a couple corpies with Bots running. Cashing is not my favorite thing in the game and anything that makes it easier I'm all for.
Bots are here to stay as is Swath Zoc and any number of helpers.
Ps...the whining comment came from the same thing being said with the solo/corpie thing being beaten to death on multiple threads....The horse is Dead...Dead ...Dead.....we get it you and Cerne cant find a regular corpie lol, all I can do is laugh at what you say. There is a reason I play solo - being a corpie, IMHO, means being at keys and playing my turns. Real life dictates that my playing time is sporadic at best, with a few days where I can devote the time a corpie should, but most of the time AFK. If I corp, I support the corp - not some botted player that logs in and doesn't play the game. Players who cannot devote the time necessary should seriously consider solo play as they will not let anyone down when RL takes them elsewhere. I would not corp with someone who did not play their turns, and I don't expect to corp when I can't pull my share. I will agree with you on the interesting part from a scripting standpoint on the multiple corpie scripts. Making the scripts work together and recovering (probably the hardest part) is an interesting aspect.
_________________
/ Promethius / Enigma / Wolfen /
"A man who has no skills can be taught, a man who has no honor has nothing."
|
| Fri May 23, 2008 9:40 pm |
|
 |
|
Promethius
Ambassador
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 3:00 am Posts: 3141 Location: Kansas
|
 Re: m()m bot
Promethius wrote: Parrothead wrote: No I like the corpies I got...We interact on voice..talk about different thing etc etc...more to corpies than a time and place to cash.
If you like solo play Prom then Play solo games...simple.
Scripts that use Corpies are interesting . We have some that use 3 or more in concert.
Low turns = Mbbs = Megarob
This means cashing gets done pretty much anytime some is at keys and the ports are up. All you need is a couple corpies with Bots running. Cashing is not my favorite thing in the game and anything that makes it easier I'm all for.
Bots are here to stay as is Swath Zoc and any number of helpers.
Ps...the whining comment came from the same thing being said with the solo/corpie thing being beaten to death on multiple threads....The horse is Dead...Dead ...Dead.....we get it you and Cerne cant find a regular corpie lol, all I can do is laugh at what you say. There is a reason I play solo - being a corpie, IMHO, means being at keys and playing my turns. Real life dictates that my playing time is sporadic at best, with a few days where I can devote the time a corpie should, but most of the time AFK. If I corp, I support the corp - not some botted player that logs in and doesn't play the game. Players who cannot devote the time necessary should seriously consider solo play as they will not let anyone down when RL takes them elsewhere. I would not corp with someone who did not play their turns, and I don't expect to corp when I can't pull my share. My preference toward solo play is in part based on this. I also like to see what I can do as a solo. The time at keys that I have available is one reason I declined to corp with you in the chess edit. Nothing personal, just don't like to let people down if they are depending on me to do something. I will agree with you on the interesting part from a scripting standpoint on the multiple corpie scripts. Making the scripts work together and recovering (probably the hardest part) is an interesting aspect.
_________________
/ Promethius / Enigma / Wolfen /
"A man who has no skills can be taught, a man who has no honor has nothing."
|
| Fri May 23, 2008 10:15 pm |
|
 |
|
Kane
Gameop
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 3:00 am Posts: 1430 Location: USA
|
 Re: m()m bot
Parrothead wrote: Ps...the whining comment came from the same thing being said with the solo/corpie thing being beaten to death on multiple threads....The horse is Dead...Dead ...Dead.....we get it you and Cerne cant find a regular corpie
Im Prom is has more then a few people that would play with him. but cerne yeah probably not.
_________________ Kane Big Game 2019 Ice 2020 HHT 2020
|
| Sat May 24, 2008 8:37 am |
|
 |
|
mob
Boo! inc.
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 2:00 am Posts: 865 Location: USA
|
 Re: m()m bot
Cerne wrote: If I am blue everything is great. if I am red, I get stuck at a nav prompt on the return to the sector from SD and I have to quit the nav prompt then create a new planet and the script runs normally until the next return from SD
Cerne
Instead of pulling your scripts from Grimy's how about a pack. Some of us don't use or want to use M()Mbot
Wildstar wrote: I am with you Cerne. I will not play in a game where I know someone is using Mombot. But you do not walk into a bar and complain people are drinking. So I am not going to go into a game and complain about it. It isnt right.
I will wait for someone to bang an unlim that has the rule of No Mombot.
But anywho... Cerne wrote: Big D wrote: This conversation is pretty much a waste of time. Especially since it started from of a lack of reading comprehension in another thread. Cerne Conversation's can only be a waste of time by someone who doesn't want to be involved in it. Now if ya meant its a waste of time cause there will ALWAYS be bots whether its mom or another bot and there is no point in arguing, then yes. We all have our own opinions and own styles, no point in trying to get everyone to see each others point of view or OPINION. Laff, Cerne the lack of reading comprehension can only be your own. The third post in your thread was the beginning of this one. Other then using the bot as a dupe, the point was WHAT else could possibly be so revolting about m()m bot since it was the only one mentioned.
_________________ “The object of war is not to die for your corp but to make the other bastard die for his.”
Boo! inc.
|
| Sat May 24, 2008 8:55 pm |
|
 |
|
Crosby
Lieutenant Commander
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 3:00 am Posts: 801 Location: Iowa
|
 Re: m()m bot
Bot vs. Dupe the only real 'dupelike' part of a bot is the status command that shows the currentline prompt info. Everything else is just ss command/suggestions that may or may not be caught and acted on by a waiting script. One of the things that attracts me to tradewars is the ability to script solutions to problems. Anything that you do in a repetative way in the game makes you go; " Hmm, aren't repetative tasks made for computers/machines? " --or-- " Darn, I just can't type that fast, couldn't a computer type that faster, with less mistakes? " So to be able to craft scripts to deal with problems in a creative way is, at least for me, a huge part of the game. I look at a bot as a solution to key time. ps <-----== worst botboy offender there is... will bot for giggles 
_________________ #+++ The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese. #---
|
| Sun May 25, 2008 7:25 am |
|
 |
|
mob
Boo! inc.
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 2:00 am Posts: 865 Location: USA
|
 Re: m()m bot
Crosby wrote: ps <-----== worst botboy offender there is... will bot for giggles  >crosby tickle on laugh return
_________________ “The object of war is not to die for your corp but to make the other bastard die for his.”
Boo! inc.
|
| Sun May 25, 2008 9:08 am |
|
 |
|
Big D
Veteran Op
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 4:04 pm Posts: 5025
|
 Re: m()m bot
Crosby wrote: Bot vs. Dupe the only real 'dupelike' part of a bot is the status command that shows the currentline prompt info. Everything else is just ss command/suggestions that may or may not be caught and acted on by a waiting script. One of the things that attracts me to tradewars is the ability to script solutions to problems. Anything that you do in a repetative way in the game makes you go; " Hmm, aren't repetative tasks made for computers/machines? " --or-- " Darn, I just can't type that fast, couldn't a computer type that faster, with less mistakes? " So to be able to craft scripts to deal with problems in a creative way is, at least for me, a huge part of the game. I look at a bot as a solution to key time. ps <-----== worst botboy offender there is... will bot for giggles  Dealing with repetitive chores is a scripts job, not a bot. I have no problem with bots in general. The problem lies within how the bot is being used. If 1 person on a corp of 5 is playing the turns of any of the other 4 corp members on a constant basis, that is no better than duping. Now; if a player is away from the keys, and the one at the keys wants to bot him to run saveme, a torp script, citkill, etc., then that isn't a problem in my opinion. The difference between a script and a bot, is that a regular script is activated by the current user, a bot is a means of letting other users activate the scripts for that user. Huge difference there.
|
| Sun May 25, 2008 11:12 am |
|
 |
|
mob
Boo! inc.
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 2:00 am Posts: 865 Location: USA
|
 Re: m()m bot
Big D wrote: The difference between a script and a bot, is that a regular script is activated by the current user, a bot is a means of letting other users activate the scripts for that user. Huge difference there. Thats what I was tryin to say, good explaination!
_________________ “The object of war is not to die for your corp but to make the other bastard die for his.”
Boo! inc.
|
| Sun May 25, 2008 11:41 am |
|
 |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 13 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|